A fair amount of critical judgment of director Denis
Villeneuve’s Prisoners seemed to
regard the film as handsomely mounted but ultimately a little hollow. I think
some of that criticism is misplaced, failing to accept Prisoners as an uncommonly well-made and involving mainstream
thriller despite how unoriginal, and occasionally thin, it may have been. In
fact, most of the criticisms aimed at
Prisoners would be better pointed at Villeneuve’s follow-up feature Enemy.
Enemy has similar
immediate surficial pleasures, boasting some great cinematography by Nicolas
Bolduc. But where Roger Deakin’s cinematography for Prisoners was unmistakably inviting, Bolduc’s cinematography, while
not without its allure, is shot through with a sickly yellow glow. The film’s
outward appearances hint at something sinister but it rarely actually manifests.
It remains a quiet, anxious hum just beneath the surface of the film’s story.
This isn’t to say that Enemy’s
story isn’t without its unsettling peculiarity. The film’s central premise
involves meek professor Adam Bell (Jake Gyllenhaal) discovering the existence
of a man, the confident actor Anthony St. Claire (Gyllenhaal), who looks
exactly like him (This after coincidentally renting one of the movies he’s all
but a glorified extra in). Javier Gullón’s script keeps dancing right up to
the line of explaining the reasons for their identical looks, suggesting
there’s some malicious or strange explanation for it. But we never receive
answers and the film slowly falls off a cliff into convoluted abstraction.
This has been a banner year for doppelgängers, including Muppets Most Wanted and Richard Ayoade’s
oddly similar sounding but superior The
Double. The Double also features
a man, played by Jesse Eisenberg, meeting another man who is precisely the same
except for drastically different personalities. Unlike The Double though, Enemy never
uses the doppelgänger angle to instill the film with any greater meaning.
There’s a literary tact in The Double
where the yin-yang of mirrored individuals becomes symbolic of the main
character’s internal desires and frustrations. Enemy, by contrast, merely
uses it for total weirdness and disappointing, one-note psychosexual nonsense.
Enemy makes grasps
for weighted meaning. Villeneuve’s shoots the film elliptically and has the
film fold in on itself. The film pretentiously opens with the epigraph “Chaos
is order yet undeciphered”. Early scenes feature Adam, in all too obvious
thematic exposition, lecturing to his class about control and repetition
(featuring casual references to the Roman Empire and Karl Marx as if it’s all so
very deep), and it’s all intended to imply greater substance. The film doesn’t
follow through on these themes with enough care or interest for them to feel
like they matter though.
Again as in Prisoners,
Gyllenhaal gives a performance stronger than the film he’s in. Gyllenhaal
imbues his characters with small gestures that make Adam and Anthony feel like
two distinguished and recognizable people. Notice the way he delivers his lines
as Adam, stumbling, constantly doubting; this is a man who is uncertain of
every tiny thing he does. He falls over his words and chokes on his own
over-heated mind. The other performers are given hardly anything to do. Melanie
Laurent and Sarah Gadon star as the romantic partners of the two leads. Little
is done to characterize them. They’re presences, not people.
The film splits its storytelling modes between a
straightforward thriller narrative and a trippy arthouse oddity. The further it
moves along though, the more the film flows with the logic of a dream.
Haunting, disturbing imagery presents itself and is then never explained. There
is a reoccurring image of a tarantula; at one point it seems poised to destroy
the city of Toronto, where the film is set. The gonzo final scene of the film, which I won’t reveal, is
as baffling as it is unnerving. It’s hard to tell how much of what we see is
actually happening (at one point, a character even asks, “What is happening?”).
In case you couldn’t already guess where this was headed: Adam
and Anthony’s live start to bleed into one another. Anthony becomes interested
in taking advantage of the situation for personal gain, while Adam is
reluctant. It’s hard to get invested though. Beguiling surfaces aside, Enemy is pointlessly dark and obscure
and it is hard to get too committed to it. Yet it’s not elusive but evasive,
failing to follow through on the story it informed us it intended to tell and
only half-heartedly telling what it does at that.
Grade: C

No comments:
Post a Comment