The Office - "Paper Airplane" - Review

One of the greatest assets and also biggest weaknesses to television as a medium is longevity. Sometimes we wish a film had a few more hours to tell its stories. There might be some aspect we would have liked it to play up but it had to cut down on for time constraints or maybe we just want to inhabit that world for a little while longer. Television, on the other hand, has time to spare. But the downside of television having all this time to tell its story is that it sometimes overstayed its welcome. Films might under stay their welcome but they often don’t have enough time to feel as if they’ve expired countless hours earlier.

Everyone has a different point where The Office began to feel like a stale but comfortable show (it was starting it for me somewhere around the fifth or sixth season). You knew what you were getting and it was perhaps a safer bet to watch The Office than take up a new show that might get canceled or whose lack of familiarity made it difficult to get into. The series was clearly declining before that point but you got trapped in the series like a security blanket. Longevity does that. It builds up a connection between you and the show, and that’s one of the crucial aspects of television, but it also allows television to get lazy and stop trying as hard to be appealing. 

There’s nothing wrong about a show acting as comfort food. Some of the best television has been purely about creating a nice little space to kill a half-hour or so. But The Office has increasingly become a show without a rudder. There are a lot of the same characters and there’s a lot of the same style and outwardly it looks much the same as ever (minus a Michael Scott and a Kelly Kippur). But often times I’ll be watching and asking myself, “What am I watching?” This season and recent seasons have felt like Office-lite. It’s similar jokes and occasionally similar scenarios but they don’t make me laugh as often or consistently and sometimes the jokes and the plots have me raising an eyebrow and actively questioning my viewing experience. 

Final seasons have a harder time than almost any other season of a series (besides may be the first season). A good final season has to achieve closure. The finale in particular needs to do this but on the whole if a final season isn’t doing something where there’s a sense that you know what happened to these characters and this world beyond the series end point than the show has failed. And right now besides a very, very small number of characters, I’m incredibly nervous that The Office is oblivious as to what it’s seeking to do with these characters. What is the show doing with these characters? Angela and Dwight are … skirting coupling. I think; it’s honestly hard to tell if that’s just a plot point to kill time in this episode or if that will go somewhere down the road. Andy is getting into acting, which has no real end goal in sight other than to keep being used as a gag. Erin and Pete are dating and it’s mostly cute, but there’s nowhere for that to go if they just stay together or if it doesn’t take a step further, which is doubtful.  What else from this episode has any potential to go anywhere? Kevin sucks at making paper airplanes as only Kevin can. Nellie is oblivious and apparently likes refereeing events. Toby is generally awkward and gets his eye temporarily eye patched – None of these stories have the ability to grow into something where we might be pleased to see the show expand upon it and use it to tell some final story about the characters. 

Take what they’re doing with Andy. Now Andy is a character this season has dropped the ball on. A show doesn’t need to have real characters, but The Office has led us to believe that it exists in a world that’s mostly very close to our own (though it’s lost that sense in recent seasons). And yet I have no idea what is going on with Andy. Granted, sometimes Michael Scott’s antics were so goofy and outlandish that they could take you out of the moment, but for the most part they kept him likable and believable enough that you were willing to put up with his craziness. There’s a type of logic that many individuals abide by and I’m a strong supporter of it. It has many names but the common one is “Fridge Logic”. In essence, it’s the notion that if you didn’t question the logic or the plotting of something in the moment you were watching it, you can’t really have qualms with it. If a tv show or a film engrossed you enough to convince you that its logic and storytelling was sound, it doesn’t matter that that in hindsight there might be problems with the plot or logical inconsistencies. It succeeded. The Office lately hasn’t been winning in the Fridge Logic department. Andy is prime example where the show is failing at this. I can roll with the idea that Andy would want to get into acting (even if I think it’s a pretty useless storyline) but the way Andy treats his acting gig is so completely strange and so completely unreal that it was hard to buy the way Andy was behaving. 

Now I don’t really give a fuck about Andy anymore. I could probably list the handful of characters that interest me on this show and Andy isn’t one of them. Kevin occasionally makes me grin, mainly due to Brian Baumgartner’s commitment to the performance. Erin is a tall glass of whimsical cutesy and Ellie Kemper is admittedly delightful at times due to her abundant enthusiasm. Other bit players still make me chuckle here and there such as Stanley, Phyllis, Darryl, and Creed. But on the whole, I just don’t care what happens to these people. We had a vested interest in Michael Scott’s story and it paid off really well. Now the only story we still have a vested interest in is Jim and Pam.

Because we have a vested interest in this story and the writers recognize this fact, Jim and Pam’s story remains to be really, really good. When Pam runs to Jim and then Jim can’t even begin to find the words to express how sorry he is and simply hugs her, it’s spine tingling. 

It’s almost as if the series knows this is technically the only story it really needs to tell in full at this point and everything else is merely filler to fill up the edges of the rest of the half-hour. I perk up in my seat when I see Jim and Pam on screen, but I slouch down immediately after the story cuts to anyone else. The moment it pops in on any other character I know it will at best be mildly amusing and at worst disappointing. When a show goes on as long as The Office has, it reminds us of the downside of the television medium. Television has always been given flack for creating content that’s passable but not great because television’s real goal is to sell ad space and last as long as it possibly can to do that. Television was created with the mindset of appealing to the broadest base of individuals to sell ads and NBC will keep on a sizable hit like The Office on long after its expiration date if we’ll tune and drop out for a little while longer; even if we’re mostly only doing it out of a desire for completism and a vague hope of closure. 

Grade: C+