Our protagonist Shae (Danielle Panabaker) is raped at one
point, and the film doesn’t blame her for it, but the only reason it has the
character get raped is to justify her killing spree against the men in her life
who have wronged her. Did it have to be rape that led to some women getting
vengeance on the men who’ve harmed them? No. I’m all for empowering women and I’m
all for strong female characters who take charge and even kill a few people to
serve up some revenge. But it just feels like it's purposely manipulating our
sentiments so we won’t be upset at the excessive violence later, and that’s
totally the wrong way to be handling rape as a subject matter. The whole rape
scene preys on our emotions. Shae is sexually assaulted but briefly manages to
gets away. We start rooting for her escape, and then the film exploits this so
we’re that much more upset when she doesn’t and the rape does take place.
Having done the necessary legwork, the film decides that
Shae and her new chic friend Lu (Nicole LaLiberte) are going to kill people
violently. What follows comes off as someone writing a film who only had a vague understanding of feminist
theories. Slumber Party Massacre
similarly attempted to be a feminist work (written by a feminist author and activist, Rita Mae Brown, no
less) and it failed miserably because it ended up objectifying the very women
it was empowering and therefore glamorized the violence towards them. The violence of Girls Against Boys is tedious, tawdry, and pointless. It’s the violence level, at times,
of a Saw film with the feigned
pretension that it’s high minded; at least, the Saw franchise knew it was schlock and schlocked it up like it was nobody’s
business.
Let’s say Girls Against Boys had just been a poor attempt at feminist
empowerment used to ground the needless violence. That would be bad enough. It
wouldn’t be the worst thing; at least it wouldn’t be straight up misogynistic
which is a slight step up from a lot of junk out there. But it doesn’t just
stick to this narrative. It has the relationship between Shae and Lu breakdown,
and Lu suddenly has an inexplicable lesbian crush on Shae that turns her psychopathic
intentions from men to Shae. Not only does this come out of nowhere, but it
undermines the message of the film.
As critic Noel Murray so perfectly described it, “Girls Against Boys is undone by [Director
Austin] Chick’s apparent supposition that he’s the first filmmaker to notice
how men sometimes take advantage of women, or how putting a gun in an actress’
hands can be a complicated symbol of empowerment”. It’s a movie that thinks it’s
being really clever, bold, and smart, but rather is being unsubtle, boring, and
occasionally borderline offensive. The film has us watching one-dimensional
characters with poorly explained motivations killing people and it presumes
that it’s the most original thing you ever did see.
Grade: D-

No comments:
Post a Comment