Friday, April 12, 2013

"Where is the Friend’s Home?" - Film Review


We’ve all been faced with a choice at one point or another. It may not have been the most earthshattering choice, but in the moment, on that day, that choice felt like life or death. We’ve all had to make a decision where we didn’t need to do something, but by not doing something it would lead to consequences for other people.

Where is the Friend’s Home? is about a choice. A boy Ahmed (Babek Ahmed Poor) accidentally takes his classmate Mohamed Reda Nematzadeh’s (Ahmed Ahmed Poor) schoolbook and he realizes that if he doesn’t get it back to him, the other boy is going to get expelled from school.

His mother (Aruna Irani) tells him he’s not allowed to return the book, and he’s torn. He knows deep down what the right thing to do is: return the book. But his moral compass gets the better of him and he flees his home and runs over far away to the city where his friend lives. He doesn’t know where his classmate lives in the city; all he knows is that he has to get this book back to him somehow.

It sounds like such a simple story and on the surface it is. But director Abbas Kiarostami plumbs the story and turns the simple ethical quandary into a fascinating exploration of ageism, growing up, and doing the right thing.

There are moments in the film that are oddly intense. Nothing major is happening, but the roadblocks the character keeps running into make what should on its face be an easy task turn into a scenario where it feels impossible. 

The more frustrating the task becomes, the more we start to root for the task’s success, and the more powerful the film’s storytelling becomes. It gradually becomes almost mesmerizing. 

Ahmed has to start asking him if it’s worth getting the book to his classmate, and may be if it’s not worth finding him. He really struggles with this decision, and the more difficult doing it becomes, the more worrisome it starts to feel that he won’t get the book to his classmate on time.

Every person he comes across proves to be useless. They either provide less than helpful information or just don’t care about an eight year old’s single-minded goal. Everyone doesn’t think much of him or his plight because he’s so young, and they just don’t see the importance of what he’s trying to do. He’s a soft-spoken kid, and he never has the courage speak up over other people and people keep ignoring him. 

The film take a brief detour to show the boy’s grandfather criticize the youth of the present day. He talks at length with a friend about how kids these days don’t have discipline. But his grandfather’s generation and his parent’s generation are often far too nostalgic or lack the understanding to appreciate the youngest generation. Ahmed is trying to get information about where his friend lives and his grandfather can’t be bothered to listen to him, but instead makes him get cigarettes for him. Then he scolds Ahmed when he comes back empty handed, and this is all despite the fact he already has a pack of cigarettes and doesn’t need anymore. The grandfather thinks he’s teaching him a valuable life lesson, but he’s really getting in the way of his grandson doing something profoundly kind and important. 

The elderly blacksmith that helps Ahmed find his classmate’s house talks about how people are changing their doors. Their switching out their wooden ones, many of which he helped put in place, with stronger iron ones. The blacksmith laments that things are changing. There’s a generational gap between him and the boy.

Eventually Ahmed does find the friend’s house after an arduous day looking. However, he’s too scared by the nighttime noises to follow through. He ends up deeply regretting his decision and feeling sick to his stomach.

The classmate sits in the school-building nervously the next day, and it’s uneasy to sit through. The teacher works his way through checking other student’s homework, and we wonder if Ahmed will show up and save his friend…

The film plays out like a beautiful little short story and as it moves along it proves itself to be an insightful, profound and engrossing fable. 

Grade: A

Community - "Intro to Felt Surrogacy" - Review



Community has had a rough time this season. Whether it was due to the vagaries that all shows suffer as they get older or the loss of creative talent, many episodes have failed to stick the landing. However, there have been episodes that, though not the best efforts the series has done, showed a way forward. On a conceptual and emotional level they didn’t feel forced. The first of these was in “Cooperative Escapism in Familial Relations” where Jeff met his father and it featured some nice, well-earned emotional moments. The most recent episode “Herstory of Dance” was another episode that though it had problems in the way this whole fourth season had problems didn’t feel like it was going through motions and like the show still had some tricks up its sleeve (I was pleasantly surprised by Abed's story with the girl who's equally obsessed with television tropes, and the Jeff-Britta conflict paid off well).

The third season had some bigger problems than many of us were willing to admit at the time, but I was willing to forgive it because it was still reaching the dizzying heights of “Remedial Chaos Theory”. The fourth season hasn’t yet reached those creative highs once again. “Intro to Felt Surrogacy” doesn’t achieve such heights but it comes within spitting distance. Of course, I can’t quite put my finger on what makes it land just shy of genius, but it doesn’t completely nail what it’s trying to do. But it’s a cool conceptual episode that the show mostly goes broke for like it did in older season rather than half-assing it like it has recently, and it chooses not to lean on campus hijinks but on the crazy concept (the characters as puppets!). In turn, it plays off the absurdity of the concept including a few musical numbers and also finds a way to pull off some solid character moments that the show just hasn’t been successful at recently. 

The series is also funnier during this half-hour than it has been in just about in any other episode, which helps a ton. It’s not all up to snuff with what we’ve come to anticipate from this series but much of this works far better than you’d expect and rises above its gimmickeness. 

Grade: A-

What did everyone else think?

Thursday, April 11, 2013

New Girl - "Bachelorette Party" - Review


If the Nick-Jess plots of recent episodes have been the highlight of the season, it came at a price. Every other potential storyline that could be done with the characters had to be put on hold in the name of Nick and Jess’ awkward dance towards coupling. In the process, Schmidt and Cece dealing with the fallout from their break up has been put on the sideline for what has arguably been far, far too long.

“Bachelorette Party” is a funny episode, but it’s an episode that focuses on Cece and, well, that’s a problem. Hannah Simone is good performer, but Cece has never been well handled for story time with our four apartment dwellers. There’s a logic to her talks with Jess about Jess’s relationship woes, but every other character doesn’t really have a reason to interact with her anymore because Schmidt is no longer dating her.
That means next to Winston, Cece is the least developed character on the show. That means that Simone has to carry the character largely by herself and the strength of her performance. The show has treated Cece only so far as she relates to Schmidt. She was vaguely made out to be this bossy type with hidden insecurity, but the series has not done the necessary groundwork with the character in the way it has with Schmidt, Nick, and Jess. 

Cece pretty much solely exists now to be won back over by Schmidt. That means that Cece essentially has no agency. And that’s a huge problem. 

Why exactly is Cece choosing to marry Shevrang? Yes, she doesn’t have much longer to have kids. But what beyond this do we know that makes her arranged marriage a sensible action on her part. Shevrang is a nice guy and he likes Cece, but Cece’s hesitancy about the whole ordeal hasn’t been played up as significantly as it likely should be.  

Winston, by the same token, is a character who the show doesn’t know what to do with. He’s whatever the writers need him to be. For instance, in this episode, Winston randomly taking things too far comes out of nowhere. Now Lamorne Morris is a very funny performer and so most of the times its forgivable because the writers have him doing things that are amusing and make me laugh. But the show needs to develop him more or else in time it will become distracting. 

The show needed to come back to Cece’s marriage in time for the finale, and it’s a good thing because it’s been overlooked for so long. But some of this episode’s impact is nullified due to how little time we’ve spent with Cece.

"Nights of Cabiria" - Film Review


I love, love, love Giulietta Masina. So much of Nights of Cabiria is sold by Masina’s great performance. Cabiria is stubborn, proud, quick-tempered, and naïve, and played by the wrong actress our sympathies wouldn’t necessarily lie with this character. It’s a tricky line being walked and Masina nails it. She’s warm and charming, and there’s something about her performance where she easily draws you in.

Cabiria is a prostitute working the streets of Rome. But the film never makes her job a big part of her character. Nights of Cabiria is part of the Italian Neorealist tradition of postwar Italian filmmaking. Cabiria a working class gal who, like many Italians of the 1950’s, was struggling to get by. Her mother put her to work at fifteen, when she was too unsuspecting to fully comprehend what she was doing at such a young age. 

She’s a bit clueless in that way though. The film starts with her getting pushed into a river by a man who feigned affection for her so he could rob her. She nearly drowns but she doesn’t immediately accept the truth of the situation; it’s only after her loving but stern friend Wanda (Franca Marzi) sets her straight that she snaps back to reality.

Throughout the film she keeps meeting men and falling head over heels for them despite her better judgment. She meets a big shot movie star, Alberto Lazzari (Amedo Nazzari), who spends the night with her after he’s spurned by his girlfriend. Cabiria flirts with the idea that something might happen even though she’s only kidding herself. The girlfriend shows up in a huff and Cabiria is forced to sit in the next room while the guy sleeps with the girlfriend. Clearly she’s chasing after the wrong men.

She becomes convinced she can’t change her life. She meets a man who provides charitable help to homeless people in the countryside, and she wonders why she can’t do something more with her life. She goes to a religious procession to a shrine for the Virgin Mary and asks for guidance, but it doesn’t help.

Cabiria’s outward cynicism hides a hopeless romantic side deep down. She finally shows this side after being hypnotized at a magician’s show. It’s a surreal scene with a dreamlike quality. I was given goosebumps; there’s a transcendence to it.  The world seems to shut out and Cabiria is told to imagine she’s talking to a man named Oscar; she’s like a giddy teenager all over again as the magician has her imagine sweet nothings are being spoken to her. She’s soon snapped back into reality and completely embarrassed. After the show, a man claims his name is Oscar and that it’s fate. 

They start spending time together. He claims he doesn’t care about her past. She even tells him about her line of work and he doesn't appear to mind. He asks her to marry him. Could this be for real? 

Director Federico Fellini sets the story in the world of the everyday. There’s a beautiful naturalism to the story and events unfold with a pleasing simplicity and feel as if they could go anywhere at any moment. Though there’s a true to life nature to the film, it also has this inexplicable whimsicalness.

Its marvelous simplicity deceptively hides a powerful tale and slowly builds to a knockout of an ending. Utterly charming, lyrical, funny, and sad, Nights of Cabiria is a fantastic movie. 

Grade: A

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

"The Invisible War" - Film Review



The Invisible War is a documentary that succeeds at being both incredibly informative and incredibly engaging. There’s not a moment where my eyes weren’t glued to the screen, even as I grew more uncomfortable and disgusted.

Writer-director Kirby Dick is scathing in his examination but he rarely forces a reaction out of us. He largely lets the terrible truth about the sexual assaults of women in the military speak for itself through the testimonies of a number of former servicewomen who were the victims of rape and sexual assault. 

These stories form the spine of The Invisible War. Dick inserts intertitles with facts, and there are more information-heavy portions where experts lend information on the nature of the situation interspersed throughout, but more important than this is how Dick finds the human story. 

He draws us in, letting the interviews with the servicewomen slowly unravel the awful reality of the military’s terrible handling and concealment of sexual assaults.

The film is never overdone or heavy-handed despite the seriousness of its subject matter.  Dick also moves the film along at a fast clip, never getting caught up for too long in any one aspect of the problem. The way he manages to pull out unexpected pieces of information is another nice detail to the film, notably a brief tangent on the rape incidences for male service members. 

The film is provocative, enlightening, and powerful. It earns just how emotionally fraught it is and it treats its subject matter with the appropriate level of sensitivity. 

Grade: A

"Grand Illusion" - Film Review


Saying Grand Illusion is a prison break movie doesn’t do it justice. Much of the film is about a group of French POW’s attempting to escape from a war camp and later a mountaintop castle. But it’s also more importantly about the things people do in the face of the futility and pointlessness of war.

Grand Illusion frequently has little in the way of plot, but is content just to observe people as they live their lives and try to survive. It’s a joyously humanistic work that’s filled with all different sorts of personalities.Our two big protagonists Captain de Boeldieu and Lieutenant Maréchal (Jean Gabin and Pierre Fresnay) are French officers taken in as prisoners of war when their plane is shot down in First World War. They soon find themselves in the company of other French POW’s who have begun tunneling towards freedom. But when they’re not digging their way to uncertain freedom, they joke around, work in a garden and even put on a play. 

The film, for all its bleak undertones on the arbitrary nature of war, is rather funny. Soldiers use jokes as defense mechanisms, and different country’s soldiers throw jabs at one another. Julien Carette’s Cartier stands out as the clown amongst the bunch, always trying to lighten the mood. 

The film breaks down into three segments. The first two revolve around “prison breaks” at two very different holding centers. The first is a war camp, but the second is a chateau lorded over by commanding officer Captain von Rauffenstein (Erich von Stroheim – noted character actor). The third becomes something far more contemplative. The two soldiers, Maréchal and Rosenthal (Marcel Dalio) who have escaped try to make their way to Switzerland but find themselves starving and cold. Rosenthal has broken his ankle and the two of them are at eachother’s throats. A sweet German widow Elsa (Dita Parlo) with a daughter is kind enough to take them in until they’re prepared to move on. Maréchal falls for the woman which makes his inevitable departure all the more painful. 

Grand Illusion isn’t concerned with making a good versus evil conflict out of its story. The Germans and French see themselves as just playing their role in the war, and both sides complain about the pointless nature of the war. The French POW’s don’t seem angry at their captors and respect their position. Both prison escape attempts come from a motivation simply to pull it off, break the rules, and stave off boredom rather than some ill-will, grudge, or fear towards their captors. Much of this provides Grand Illusion with a lovely naturalistic quality. 

All of this sounds like it would be so obvious and forced but director Jean Renoir handles it with a simplicity, subtly and grace that puts other films who've attempted its sentiments to shame.

Funny, sad, and thrilling, and filled with great performances, Grand Illusion is a deeply humanistic film. 

Grade: A-

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Doctor Who - "The Rings of Akhaten" - Review


“Is it true?” – Clara “It’s a nice story” – The Doctor

The second episode with a new companion is typically an episode where the Doctor takes them for a test run. "The Rings of Akhaten" is no exception to this rule. Much like in other episodes with this aim, the story is set on some alien planet to put the companion in a completely fish out of water scenario where they show their worth.

Much in this vein the Doctor is able to observe Clara and see what a really great person she is, and how she has many of the qualities a good companion ought to have. She sees a scared child and immediately decides she needs to help her (shades of “The Beast Below”). She questions him when it looks like they’re walking away from a problem (“We don’t walk away,” he quickly assures her). 

This is very much a Clara episode. When she comes across the scared Queen Merry, the episode spends a long stretch of time watching her calm down the child, drawing upon her own experiences with her deceased mother (a character who's influence will presumably be a major part of Clara's identity and story as the series goes forward). The episode begins with the Doctor popping in on significant moments in Clara’s life, trying to suss out what her mysterious deal is. In the process we witness a touching, sweet and sad story about Clara’s mother and father meeting (fate landed a leaf on his face and she saved him from being hit by a car). They have their first date, fall in love, have Clara, and, before her time, Clara’s mother dies. It packs a surprising wallop for such a short little tale and it leads to another teary moment at episode’s end (one of those deeply moving moments that Doctor Who excels at - but more on that later). 

Though it starts out strong featuring Clara's backstory and introducing the alien world nicely (lots and lots of different aliens abound), the episode gets stuck and a little convoluted in the middle for a while once the ceremony takes place and Merry starts singing to please the “god” (Grandfather? The Old God? - there's a reveal upon a reveal upon a reveal to the point that it's over done, but it's all in service of that ending which is, to be fair, a marvelous ending) that the people of this planet worship. It’s all cool in theory but it takes way too long to get its point across. However, once Mary is sucked into the temple by the displeased “god”, the episode kicks into high gear, the action is fun (if not pushed past too quickly), and the story uses the tiny details accrued about this world smartly (“psychometry” where currency is embodied by items with sentimental value is a great idea). 

The supposed "god" is an alarm clock for the real "god" who turns out to be planet sized "god" with a pension for feeding on people's souls/stories (like I said: slightly convoluted). The Doctor provides the lovely little notion that souls are a collection of stories; the Doctor, of course, offers himself and his boundless stories up as a sacrifice, which gives Matt Smith one of those soul-crushing, heartbreaking monologues he constantly nails. But Clara steps in last moment and offers up the leaf that landed on her father’s face: to the days that never were; infinity of lifetimes Clara’s mother will never get to live (Jenna Louise-Coleman sells the hell out of this moment). It’s a story that even the parasite can’t handle, and the day is saved. 

As a whole the episode is mostly a letdown, but it’s filled with lovely little moments that make up for it. Most of them center on us discovering just what it is that makes Clara, well, Clara. I like Louise-Coleman’s performance and she works well with Smith, but that’s not enough to make a character. Clara’s inability to decide where to travel to first is such a nice, telling character detail, and so are other occurrences throughout the episode from Clara’s sitdown with Mary to her initial refusal to abandon and later decision rescue the Doctor.

I wish they'd do more with a new character early on in their presence in the show and not plop them down in a needlessly complex story that has a lot going on (the story of the parents takes away from story taking place on Akhaten later which is partially why it gets messy). But I like this new character and I look forward to what she has to bring to the show. 

Grade: B-